.png)
The problem
Give your responsible officer continuous evidence, not a fire drill: why it breaks now
Critical infrastructure rules increasingly name identity and access systems directly, and a named individual is now personally accountable for the answer. That attestation is only as strong as the evidence behind it — and most teams assemble that evidence by hand in the weeks before it's due. Rencore replaces the fire drill with a standing evidence trail.
Built for your role
What each stakeholder gets
- CISO / Security Leader. When the attestation is due, is the evidence continuous, or assembled by hand the week before? Rencore replaces the fire drill with a standing evidence trail the responsible officer can point to.
- IT Administrator / M365 Architect. Identity and access sprawl across a distributed energy estate cannot be reviewed by hand at the pace regulation now expects. Automate the policy enforcement instead of chasing every exception manually.
- IT Manager / IT Director. In DACH specifically, being registered and governed ahead of the other 61.5% of in-scope entities is a result worth reporting upward, not just a compliance checkbox.
- Business Leader / AI Champion. AI-assisted grid operations raise the same access question as any other rollout: what can the model see. Govern that boundary once, and the rest of the AI roadmap moves faster, not slower.
Why Rencore
Proof points
- 13x Named by Gartner as the third-party governance alternative
- 4.8/5 Rating on G2
- 157% Year-one ROI reported by customers
- 100%+ ARR growth, three years running
Critical infrastructure rules increasingly name identity and access systems directly, and a named individual is now personally accountable for the answer. Rencore keeps that answer current, every day.
Trusted by security, IT, and platform leaders
Security, IT, and platform leaders use Rencore to see their Microsoft estate, cut cost and risk, and roll out Copilot and agents on a governed foundation.
-
With Rencore's scalable automation solutions, organizations can not only meet current challenges but also prepare themselves for future technological advancements.
Case Study
Philipp Widmer Head of Platform Services Universitätsspital Basel -
26% vs 3%
Organizations that govern Microsoft 365 well realize significant Copilot value 26% of the time, versus 3% for those that do not.
Gartner, 2025 Microsoft 365 Copilot Survey -
As we continue to expand our cloud capabilities, the foundation laid by Rencore Governance will undoubtedly play a crucial role in ensuring that each step forward is taken with confidence, security, and compliance in mind.
Case Study
Claude Bisdorff Head of IT Systems Ville de Luxembourg -
116%
ROI from Microsoft 365 Copilot once the program is adopted and governed, in Forrester’s Total Economic Impact study.
Forrester Total Economic Impact -
I currently estimate that we save around €80k per year by freeing up our IT admin team to do the work that counts.
Case Study
Undisclosed Former Lead O365 Competence Center Royal BAM -
71%
of enterprises name security and governance among their top challenges to deploying Microsoft 365 Copilot.
Gartner -
Rencore's centralized governance tool excelled at ensuring secure data in Microsoft 365 and minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
Case Study
-
150,000+
AI agents in use at the average Fortune 500 company by 2028. Agent sprawl is the next sprawl.
Gartner -
With Rencore Governance we are able to reduce manual governance activities, improve our service quality and generate valuable insights across our Microsoft service stack.
Undisclosed Head of AI & Process Automation Wacker Chemie AG
Where this hits hardest
UK & Ireland
Ofgem's NIS framework requires a named responsible officer to personally attest to the organization's security posture. That attestation is only as strong as the evidence behind it — this is the strongest, most quantifiable operational hook in this framework, and Rencore removes the recurring labor entirely.
Nordics & Benelux
The Dutch Cyberbeveiligingswet (Cbw) takes effect on 15 August 2026 with no grace period. Any Netherlands-based energy operator without continuous access governance in place before that date is exposed from day one.
DACH
NIS2UmsuCG is already in force, but only 38.5% of in-scope entities are registered with the BSI. Being ahead of that curve, and being able to prove it, is a defensible position worth reporting upward — not just a compliance checkbox.
North America
NERC CIP-015-2 names Active Directory directly as part of the compliance obligation — one of the most literal regulatory links to what Rencore governs. FERC Order 893 gives budget-constrained teams a genuine funding path.