Prove compliance across Microsoft 365, Copilot and agents

The compliance engine checks every object in your inventory against the policies you switch on, and flags each violation it finds. You then resolve flagged violations with built-in actions and automations, rather than exporting a list and chasing it by hand.

Over 100 fully customizable policy templates, built from best practices around the most requested use cases. Switch a template on or off, customize it, or build your own in the policy builder over any data Object or relation across multiple services.

Rencore Governance complements and extends Microsoft's own controls rather than standing in for them. Purview classifies and protects data. Rencore inventories the objects around it, checks them against the policies you switch on, and routes the fix to the owner, so the controls you have configured in Microsoft hold up across the estate.

Violations per service and per category, and your compliance status over time, across security posture, service adoption, platform costs and operations.

Reports over the inventory, the violations per policy and the trend over time, scheduled or on demand. When an auditor asks who can reach what, the answer is a document you already have, not a screenshot hunt.

The same engine backs all four: the policies check your estate continuously and the reports carry the evidence. The dedicated pages for GDPR, the EU AI Act, DORA and NIS2 map each regulation to the Microsoft estate. No tool makes you compliant on its own; that judgement stays with your organization and its auditors.

Where Microsoft 365 data at rest sits follows the tenant's Default Geography, which is set at sign-up, so the baseline is simple. The complexity comes from the layers added on top. Multi-Geo, a separate add-on, places individual users, mailboxes and sites in satellite geographies, and Advanced Data Residency is a tenant-level add-on with its own commitments, so the answer can differ per tenant and per workspace. Several tenants, for example after an acquisition, can each have a different Default Geography. Then come the services, connected third-party apps and copies your own users export, which fall outside the core data residency commitments. Control means knowing each tenant's geography, which users and sites sit elsewhere and which connected services and apps hold copies, and checking that list on a schedule instead of once.

Usually three causes. The data is scattered: Teams, SharePoint, Exchange, Entra and Power Platform each report only on themselves, so no report shows who owns a workspace, who can reach it and which policy it breaks. There is no time axis: settings are checked when someone asks, not continuously, so a violation from last month cannot be reconstructed. And ownership is missing: security and compliance see the finding, but the owner of the workspace never hears about it. Purview and Entra classify, protect and manage identities; what you need in addition is an inventory across services, policies that check it continuously, and reports that show the trend.

An auditor's questions are always the same: who owns this workspace, who can access it, why does it exist and what happened to it when the project ended. For a managed workspace the answers sit in one record. For an unmanaged one, with no owner, no recorded purpose and no review date, each answer is a manual search across Teams, SharePoint, Entra groups and exports, and the evidence ends up as screenshots that are stale by the time the audit starts. The effort shrinks when every workspace has a named owner from creation, an owner review at a set interval, archiving once it goes inactive and a log of each decision, so audit preparation means exporting what already exists instead of reconstructing it.