Start free trial
How-to

How to prepare Microsoft 365 for NIS2

NIS2 asks you to prove control, not assert it. Map the duties to Microsoft 365, set a baseline, keep owners and reviews current and package evidence.

How-to

NIS2 readiness in Microsoft 365 is the work of showing that access, configuration and incidents in your tenant are handled the way the NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 requires of essential and important entities. The gaps tend to sit in the evidence: who has access, who owns each asset, what changed and when it was last reviewed, kept as records an auditor can follow from duty to proof.

In short

  • NIS2 makes management accountable for cybersecurity risk measures and expects you to show they work.
  • In Microsoft 365 the hard part is keeping that evidence current over time.
  • Owners, access reviews and configuration checks that run on a schedule produce that evidence as a by-product.
  • When the evidence already exists, an audit is a matter of packaging it.

What NIS2 asks of a Microsoft 365 tenant

NIS2 widens the set of organizations in scope and raises the bar from having controls to proving them. Article 20 makes the management body approve and oversee the cybersecurity risk-management measures. Article 21 lists those measures, among them asset management, access control, multi-factor authentication and basic cyber hygiene. Article 23 sets the reporting clock for significant incidents: an early warning within 24 hours and a notification within 72 hours.

Each of those duties lands on Microsoft 365. The tenant holds your identities, your collaboration data and, increasingly, the agents and automations that act on it. Member states transpose the directive into national law, so check your national requirements alongside this How-to.

Why the evidence trail is where entities fall short

A tenant can be configured well on the day of an assessment and drift a month later. A guest stays in a team after the project ends, an administrator loses MFA during an account change, a mailbox forwarding rule appears. NIS2 asks you to show control over time, so the record of who reviewed what, and what was fixed, matters as much as the settings themselves.

Step by step

These five steps build the Microsoft 365 part of your NIS2 evidence so that it accumulates during normal operations.

  1. Map the NIS2 duties to Microsoft 365 controls

    Translate the Article 21 measures that touch the tenant into concrete controls: MFA for administrators, guest and external access, mailbox forwarding and audit settings, app permissions in Entra ID, ownership of teams and sites. Give each control a named owner, so every duty has someone who answers for it.

  2. Set a baseline for access and configuration

    Record the state you consider correct for each control, such as every administrator with MFA, no mailbox rule that redirects mail to an external recipient and at least two owners per team. A baseline lets you show what good looked like and spot drift away from it.

    Tip: Express the baseline as policies that flag every deviation. A document describing the baseline proves nothing on its own.

  3. Keep owners and access reviews current

    Make sure every workspace, app and agent has an accountable owner, and have owners confirm on a schedule who can reach it, guests included. Reviews that owners complete leave a dated record of who decided what.

  4. Capture changes and incident evidence

    Keep the Microsoft 365 audit log in Microsoft Purview at a retention period that covers your reporting duties, and watch for the changes that matter under NIS2: redirect rules that send mail to external recipients, new high-privilege app permissions and risky sign-ins.

  5. Package the evidence for audit

    Assemble the control map, the baseline, the policy results over time and the completed reviews into reports an auditor can follow from each duty to its proof. Schedule them, so the package exists before anyone asks for it.

Connectors in this How-to

Each connector page in the Rencore docs lists the objects, policies, reports and actions behind these steps.

Watch it in Rencore

Short narrated product guides that play in your browser, with no sign-in.

  • Scheduled owner review

    Length: 5 min

    Members and guests drift out of date every week, and nobody checks them unless a review makes them.

    • Teams
    • Reviews
  • Recertify guest and external access

    Length: 4 min

    Guests and external users keep their access long after the work ends, and nobody confirms whether each one still needs it.

    • Teams
    • SharePoint
    • Entra ID
    • Reviews
    • Access & Sharing
  • Entra ID and app registrations under control

    Length: 6 min

    An app that can read every mailbox has no owner, and an expiring secret can stop an integration without warning.

    • Entra ID
    • Exchange
    • Access & Sharing
    • Policies
    • Automation
  • Build a governance dashboard

    Length: 4 min

    Leadership, security and service owners each want their own view of the estate, and building every one by hand takes days.

    • Teams
    • SharePoint
    • Power Platform
    • Copilot
    • Dashboards

Common questions about NIS2 and Microsoft 365

Does NIS2 apply to how we run Microsoft 365?
If your organization is an essential or important entity under NIS2, its risk-management measures cover the network and information systems you use to deliver your services, and for most organizations that includes Microsoft 365. Identities, access, collaboration data and the agents built on them all fall under the Article 21 measures, such as access control and asset management. Your national transposition law and your competent authority decide the details, so confirm your classification with them.
Is Microsoft Secure Score enough as NIS2 evidence?
Secure Score is a useful measure of configuration against Microsoft's recommendations, and Microsoft Purview keeps the audit log of what happened in the tenant. Neither tells you who owns each team, site, app or agent, or whether those owners have confirmed who still needs access. NIS2 evidence needs both halves: the technical settings and the accountability record around them.
How often should access be reviewed for NIS2?
NIS2 does not prescribe a review interval. A defensible pattern is quarterly reviews for most workspaces and shorter intervals for workspaces with external users or sensitive data, with escalation when an owner does not respond. What matters to an auditor is that the cycle runs, that unconfirmed access is removed and that each decision is recorded.
How does Rencore support NIS2 readiness?
Rencore Governance covers the Microsoft 365 slice of your NIS2 evidence. It inventories users, groups, teams, sites, apps and agents with their owners, runs built-in policies such as administrators without MFA, mailboxes with external redirect rules and risky sign-ins, and has owners recertify access in recurring reviews in the Rencore Teams App. Reports can be scheduled or exported on demand. It complements Microsoft Purview and Entra ID and does not replace your own NIS2 assessment.

Last updated 8 October 2026

See your NIS2 evidence for Microsoft 365

We will show the owners, access reviews and policy results that make up the Microsoft 365 part of your NIS2 evidence, in a short demo.

Rencore newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest insights on governing Microsoft 365, Copilot and AI agents, delivered to your inbox.

Loading form