.png)
The problem
Stop access from outliving the contract that created it: why it breaks now
The same collaboration sprawl that exists in regulated infrastructure exists here too, without a personal attestation duty attached. The driver is operational risk and cost: site-level Teams and SharePoint access grows with every contractor and vendor relationship, and most of it outlives the project that created it. Rencore automates onboarding and offboarding so access doesn't linger.
Built for your role
What each stakeholder gets
- CISO / Security Leader. Reframe this conversation as operational risk exposure, not personal liability. The question is not who signs an attestation, it is who still has access from a project that ended last year.
- IT Administrator / M365 Architect. Site-level Teams and SharePoint access grows with every contractor and vendor relationship. Automate onboarding and offboarding so access does not outlive the contract.
- IT Manager / IT Director. Continuity planning increasingly includes digital access, not just physical assets. Build access governance into standard operating procedure so it doesn't surface as a gap during an incident review.
- Business Leader / AI Champion. AI adoption in industrial operations still needs a governed boundary, even without a regulator naming it directly. Get ahead of that boundary now, while the rollout is still small enough to govern cleanly.
Why Rencore
Proof points
- 13x Named by Gartner as the third-party governance alternative
- 4.8/5 Rating on G2
- 157% Year-one ROI reported by customers
- 100%+ ARR growth, three years running
Site-level collaboration sprawl is operational risk and cost, not personal liability. Rencore governs third-party and contractor access before it becomes a business interruption.
Trusted by security, IT, and platform leaders
Security, IT, and platform leaders use Rencore to see their Microsoft estate, cut cost and risk, and roll out Copilot and agents on a governed foundation.
-
With Rencore's scalable automation solutions, organizations can not only meet current challenges but also prepare themselves for future technological advancements.
Case Study
Philipp Widmer Head of Platform Services Universitätsspital Basel -
26% vs 3%
Organizations that govern Microsoft 365 well realize significant Copilot value 26% of the time, versus 3% for those that do not.
Gartner, 2025 Microsoft 365 Copilot Survey -
As we continue to expand our cloud capabilities, the foundation laid by Rencore Governance will undoubtedly play a crucial role in ensuring that each step forward is taken with confidence, security, and compliance in mind.
Case Study
Claude Bisdorff Head of IT Systems Ville de Luxembourg -
116%
ROI from Microsoft 365 Copilot once the program is adopted and governed, in Forrester’s Total Economic Impact study.
Forrester Total Economic Impact -
I currently estimate that we save around €80k per year by freeing up our IT admin team to do the work that counts.
Case Study
Undisclosed Former Lead O365 Competence Center Royal BAM -
71%
of enterprises name security and governance among their top challenges to deploying Microsoft 365 Copilot.
Gartner -
Rencore's centralized governance tool excelled at ensuring secure data in Microsoft 365 and minimizing the risk of unauthorized access.
Case Study
-
150,000+
AI agents in use at the average Fortune 500 company by 2028. Agent sprawl is the next sprawl.
Gartner -
With Rencore Governance we are able to reduce manual governance activities, improve our service quality and generate valuable insights across our Microsoft service stack.
Undisclosed Head of AI & Process Automation Wacker Chemie AG
Where this hits hardest
UK & Ireland
Ofgem's NIS attestation duty doesn't extend to this sub-industry. The conversation here is about third-party and contractor access at site level, not personal signature risk.
Nordics & Benelux
Where the Dutch Cbw's scope reaches industrial and resource operators, the message is operational continuity: unmanaged third-party access is a business interruption risk, not a signature on a form.
DACH
The NIS2UmsuCG registration gap is still a useful peer-comparison point for in-scope operators here, even without the personal attestation angle that applies to regulated infrastructure.
North America
NERC CIP-015-2 and FERC Order 893 apply most directly to grid-connected assets. For industrial and resource operators, the sharper argument is cost and operational continuity: unmanaged access to operational collaboration tools is a business risk regardless of which specific rule applies.