The problem
Turn recurring guest-access review into automatic enforcement: why it breaks now
Clinical and research collaboration depends on external access that has to be reviewed and re-approved on a recurring cycle. That cycle is a standing administrative cost, not a one-off task — and it's usually somebody's manual job every month. Rencore automates the lifecycle so it stops recurring as labor.
Built for your role
What each stakeholder gets
- CISO / Security Leader. Ask who currently has external access to clinical or research data, and how confident that answer is right now. Rencore keeps that answer current, not reconstructed on request.
- IT Administrator / M365 Architect. The NHSmail 30-then-180-day guest re-approval cycle is standing labor on somebody's calendar every month. Automate the lifecycle, and it stops recurring.
- IT Manager / IT Director. Access-trail evidence for patient data needs to be provable the day it's asked for, not rebuilt after the fact. Build the trail into daily operations instead of into audit week.
- Business Leader / AI Champion. Clinical teams want the productivity of Microsoft 365 Copilot without opening a new patient-data question. Govern the boundary first, and the adoption conversation gets easier, not harder.
Why Rencore
Proof points
- 13x Named by Gartner as the third-party governance alternative
- 4.8/5 Rating on G2
- 157% Year-one ROI reported by customers
- 100%+ ARR growth, three years running
Clinical and research collaboration depends on external access that has to be reviewed and re-approved on a recurring cycle. Rencore turns that standing administrative cost into a governed lifecycle.
Trusted by security, IT, and platform leaders
Security, IT, and platform leaders use Rencore to see their Microsoft estate, cut cost and risk, and roll out Copilot and agents on a governed foundation.
Where this hits hardest
UK & Ireland
NHSmail requires guest access re-approval every 30 days initially, then every 180 days on an ongoing basis. This is the strongest, most quantifiable operational hook in this framework: recurring labor that a Rencore-governed lifecycle removes entirely.
Nordics & Benelux
Beyond general EU data protection obligations, no named regional regulation for hospital data sharing is confirmed yet. The argument here is the operational cost of manual guest review, not a specific named rule.
DACH
Hospital collaboration in Germany and Austria runs under standard data protection obligations for patient data. The reliable hook here is the same recurring guest-access burden, not a named law.
North America
HIPAA's access-control and audit requirements mean hospital IT teams need to prove who touched patient data, on demand. Reported access-trail incidents in healthcare show what happens when that proof isn't readily available.

